免费日韩片_欧美成人精品一区二区男人小说_国产乱码一区二区三区四区_国产精品国产三级国产aⅴ入口_成人看的污污超级黄网站免费_欧美一级在线免费观看_成人午夜免费无码福利片_国产乱人伦偷精品视频色欲_aaa少妇高潮大片免费看_国产精品1234_亚洲精品国产suv一区88_中文字字幕在线中文无码_精品亚洲区_午夜九九九_国产av国片精品jk制服丝袜_色综合亚洲_亚洲成av人片无码bt种子下载_欧美色就色_精品少妇的一区二区三区四区_男人用嘴添女人下身免费视频

Zhao Shukai

The opening-up of villages has brought about full exchanges of resources and information with the outside world. Such changes, including especially the flow of population have brought many variables for the relatively stable village life. These variables have changed not only villagers’ daily life but also the internal and external relations of villages as well as the process and structure of social governance of villages. Viewing from the interaction between farmers and the government, farmers could exert more impact on the government and are more likely to be organized when striving for certain matters. Under such circumstances, the government should seriously consider how to adjust their way of governance to facilitate its interaction with rural society. Based on new governance concepts, the government should make clear “what it should not do”. 1. The government should not treat village cadres as public servants. Village and county-level governments should exercise the target-oriented accountability system over village cadres. The income standard of village-level cadres should be evaluated and fixed by village and county-level governments. In view of the provisions offered by the government, the village cadres have completely become “employees of the government”. In terms of the overall picture of village governance, such a practice should be corrected. 2. The government should not pursue “perfect organization”. In current rural work, demanding village-level organizations to be perfect has cost lots of energy of grassroots governments. Instead, it is suggested in the rural work to have loosely organized forms. Village organizations are not that essential if only there are people in charge of village work. The role of the government lies primarily in supervising the performance of rural society and regulating public activities of rural areas in accord with laws and regulations. 3. The government should not manipulate village-level election. When election really becomes a matter within the village and of villagers themselves, many problems regarding village self-governance will no longer be there. 4. The government should not regard non-governmental organizations as “dissidents”. Under new social conditions, we should above all look upon these organizations as cooperative partners rather than dissident forces.