|
Iran threatens full-scale enrichment work
(AP)
Updated: 2006-02-03 08:52
Iran, which claims its program is peaceful and aimed only at generating
electricity, has repeatedly warned that such action would provoke it into doing
exactly what the world wants it to renounce — starting full-scale uranium
enrichment — as well as curtailing IAEA inspections.
Key members of the Security Council remained unmoved.
Grigory Berdennikov, Russia's chief IAEA delegate, reinforced Moscow's
position outside the meeting, saying referral to the Security Council would send
Iran "a serious signal."
Schulte agreed.
"It is time to send a clear and unequivocal message to the Iranian regime
about the concerns of the international community by reporting this issue to the
Security Council," he said.
Washington has waited years for international suspicions over Iran's nuclear
ambitions to translate into support among board nations.
Only a simple majority is needed to approve the text, but the United States
and its backers have held off pushing for earlier referral in hopes of building
support for the measure. Support has grown since Jan. 10, when Iran stripped
IAEA seals from enrichment equipment and announced it would restart the program.
While a broad majority of member nations support referral, a few countries
that have policy disputes with Washington remain opposed — among them Cuba,
Venezuela, Syria and Belarus.
"My delegation manifests its total disagreement with the proposal ... to
bring it to the Security Council," said Venezuela's Gustavo Marques Marin. And
Syria's Safwan Ghanem told reporters: "We will vote 'no.'"
A vote was expected Friday or Saturday. Countries opposed have the choice of
voting against the text or abstaining.
Speaking for Germany, Britain and France — the three nations representing the
European Union — German chief delegate Herbert Honsowitz told the meeting: "The
time now has come for the Security Council to get involved."
The confidential draft resolution obtained by the AP "requests the director
general to report to the Security Council" on steps Iran needs to take to dispel
international suspicion it could be seeking to manufacture nuclear arms.
The draft expresses "serious concerns about Iran's nuclear program" and notes
"the absence of confidence that Iran's nuclear program is exclusively for
peaceful purposes."
If the board approves referral as expected, it will launch a protracted
process that could end in Security Council sanctions for Tehran.
But no action is expected for weeks, if not months. Moscow and Beijing
support referral only on condition that the council do nothing until at least
March, when the board next meets to review the status of an IAEA inquiry into
Iran's nuclear program and recommends further action.
"I am making very clear that the Security Council is not asked at this stage
to take any action," ElBaradei said.
Berdennikov also told reporters that Russia "insists" no Security Council
action be taken before March.
|
